FACTS The appellant worked for the bank in question. In the departmental hearings, the bank fired him. The appellant filed a complaint against the stated dismissal order with the Central Government Industrial Tribunal by section 10(2)(a) of the Industrial Disputes Act. The CGIT overturned the dismissal decision and issued a decision ordering the reinstatement of […]

Facts:  An advertisement was made for the purpose of filling up of 3587 Group ‘C’ Posts of Gram Panchayat  Adhikari on 22.06.2015. The selection process was completed in accordance with the 2015 Rules. • The Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in allowing the writ petition filed by the  private Respondents,

FACTS:  A notification under Section 4 of the Act 1894 came to be issued for acquiring the lands in question for  the construction of Gas Compressor Station and necessary facilities under the Reliance Gas  Transportation, Surat on 30.07.2008. Declaration under Section 6 of the Act 1894 was issued on  1.6.2009. The Land Acquisition Officer/Collector declared

FACTS OF THE CASE : The appellants agreed to sell the property that is the subject of this suit to the respondent. They signed two different sales agreements. Clause 8 of the Sale Agreements required the respondent to obtain the necessary No Objection Certificates and notify the appellants. Since one of the appellants was a

Facts Feeling offended and unsatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 03.07.2017 issued by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench in Misc. Bench No.4149 of 2006, by which the High Court has allowed the said writ petition to the extent of Plot No.219, 1 bigha, 10 Biswas, and 10 biswansi, Village

Facts – The appellant Board is a corporation incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and is under the control of the Government of Kerala. It generates, transmits, and distributes electricity throughout the state of Kerala. All of the respondents in the current litigation are commercial/industrial consumers with LT (Law Tension) connections. At the time of

Facts – The prosecution alleged that on 23-04-2009 at 10:00 a.m., a women in burnt condition was brought to the hospital by her husband (the appellant). Police Station Ashok Nagar District Guna, M.P., requested Pushpa’s MLC and recorded her dying declarations. On 23-04-2009, burnt clothes smelling of kerosene oil, one chimani, one broken mangalsutra, and

FACTS –  The appellant, in this case, is Wave Industries Pvt. Ltd. and the respondent is Uttar Pradesh State Sugar Corporation (UPSSCL). The appellants were unsuccessful in their challenge before the High Court and the liability of payment of Rs. 5,68,797/- is declared to be borne by the Wave Industries Ltd. The appeal relates to

FACTS –  The appellant was charged with and put to trial in respect of nine distinct first information reports relating to alleged incidents involving the theft of electricity equipment belonging to the Electricity Department of the State of Uttar Pradesh. The appellant agreed to a plea bargain; the appellant was convicted under Section 136 of

Facts:  Land was transferred to DDA by LAC.  Compensation has not been tendered to the original writ petitioners of the High Court. There was no mention of transfer of land by LAC to DDA but handing over of possession by the Tehsil staff to the Land and Building Department. The HC does believe in taking