Introduction  In common parlance, the word ‘Abet’ signifies help, co-activity, and support and incorporates within its ambit, an illegitimate reason to commit the crime. So as to bring an individual abetting the doing of a thing under any of the conditions specified under Section 107 of the Indian Penal Code, it isn’t just important to

Issue – Whether the two–year period specified under Section 11 A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 will apply even after the repeal of the 1894 Act, or the twelve–month period specified in Section 25 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 will apply for the

Introduction: The parties were the shareholders of the investment holding company named Atlas Equifin Private Limited, India. It held 11,05,829 equity shares of Rs.10 each in Multi Screen Media Pvt. Ltd. The appellant attempted to sell the shares in Multi Screen Media Pvt. Ltd. in 2002. Standard Chartered Bank (SCB) made their agent identify the

Introduction: This Judgement clarifies the jurisdiction of the State Investigating Agency to investigate, remand, and commit a case for trial relating to the scheduled offenses under the National Investigation Agency (NIA) Act.  Brief Facts of the Case:  Contentions of the Appellants:  The Appellant claimed that the  State Investigating Agency divested its jurisdiction and breached the

Introduction: Brief Facts of the Case: Contentions of the Appellants: Contentions of the Respondent: Principles and observations of the Court: Judgment Held: The Supreme Court dismissed the writ petition. It has further clarified that their decision will neither restrict the 1st respondent nor the executive from exercising their discretion in the future. Opinion: The decision

Judgement Name: Laxmibai Chandaragi B & Anr. v. The State of Karnataka & Ors. Writ Petition [Criminal] No.359/2020. Court Name: Supreme Court of India Facts: Santosh and Laxmi were both working as assistant professors in different colleges and developed a mutual attraction for each other while meeting regularly. However, there was opposition from Laxmi’s parents,

Introduction: A civil appeal was made before the high court of Jharkhand at Ranchi, regarding the negligence of pleading. The appellant claimed that he preferred motor vehicle act no.66 of 2011 whereas the respondent preferred no.115 of 2011 of the motor vehicle act.  Facts: Due to the rash and negligent driving of Mr. Sunil Gurum,

Introduction: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the appeal of the appellant dated 06-11-2008 and upheld the order of conviction and sentence passed by the Trial Court on 11-12-1997. Facts: Appellant 1 and the deceased were married on 01-07-1994. On 31-07-1995, some person informed the Complainant at about 4 or 4.30 that their