Introduction The case is concerned with order 39  rule 1 and rule 2 and Section 96 (1)  of Civil procedure court and sets out the jurisdiction of the lower court.Order 39 rule1 talks about the temporary injunction in any matter and order 39 rule 2 talks about the injunction to restrain or stop repetition or continuance

Brief fact of the case: The case before the Delhi district court stated by the plaintiff, he filed a case suit for recovery of Rs. 11, 58,298 on the other he is a municipal contractor and to present the work on order no. 236dated 26.12.2014. After that the present of work carried to the satisfaction

Brief fact of the case:  In this the respondent opened a trading broker with respect of  MCX exchange the account number was MTC-22 and he said to deposit a sum of Rs. 3,10,000 a date between 7.06.2007 to 5.07.2007. The case of the respondent was that, appellant did uncertified trading in his account and it

Introduction: The web never rests ; and the web always remembers ! The genuine tremendousness of this reality has unfolded throughout hearings led in the current matter, when it happened that notwithstanding orders of this court, even the respondents who were able to consent to headings gave to eliminate affronting content from the internet, communicated

Facts The Appellant recorded a complaint under Section 35 of Advocates Act, 1961 against the Respondent, an advocate in District Sant Rabidass Nagar, Bhadohi before the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh (‘BCUP’) for having purportedly manufactured and fabricated reports including settlement archives without the consent of the parties in the Consolidation Court. The Complainant attempted

Brief Facts: During the course of this case, Thyssen dismissed a welder from its work in 2015 for demonstrations of improper behaviour. The matter was at first heard before a placation official and afterward in reference under the guidance of a labor court in Pune. An application was documented by the welder under section 36(4)

In the case of Wg. Cdr. Arifur Rahman Khan And Others vs Dlf Southern Homes Pvt. Ltd., the Supreme Court of India held on August 25, 2020 that when a developer fails to fulfil contractual obligations to provide possession of a flat to a homebuyer within the time specified in the agreement, it is a

The Supreme Court of India held on November 2, 2020, in the case of M/s Imperia Structures Ltd v Anil Patni & Others (Civil Appeal No. 3581-3590 of 2020), that the redressal mechanism / provisions under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016 (RERA) do not act as a bar to complaints under the

The Oil and natural gas Commission has directed Saw Pipes to provide off-shores exploration services available from licensed European manufacturers. Shipping was postponed due to a general strike by steelworkers in Europe. Timely delivery was the subject of contracts. ONGC provided an extension of time, but relied on the provision of a recovery by deducting