This appeal challenges the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal’s (hereafter referred to as the “NCLAT”) judgment and order dated December 21, 2018, which allowed the appeal filed by respondent herein Kay bouvet. In this case, the defendant has opted to file an appeal with the Appeal Company (AT) (Insolvency) No. 582 of 2018, in defiance

In the present appeal is to an order gone along the high court of Uttarakhand in the application no. 105/2008 on 23.04.2008. Where the factum of death of Pradeep Kumar, the ownership of the property interest of Tika Ram. The tenant wasn’t considered. The appellant argument of  partnership between Pradeep Kumar and Subhash Chand, respondent

Background: This case is a scorn request recorded under the watchful eye of the Supreme Court of India which features the urgent issues related with “Criminalization of Politics” in India. This case is otherwise called Criminalisation in the Politics case. Prior to going into the benefits of the case, we will initially comprehend the idea

FACTS Future Group, India’s second largest organized offline retailer, sought to work with international investors to expand its company in 2019. Future Coupons Private Limited (“FCPL”) was reorganized by the promoters (“Biyanis”) to purchase shares in Future Retail Limited (“FRL”). Amazon.com NV Investment Holdings LLC (“Amazon”), seeing it as a fantastic opportunity, invested Rs.1,431 crores

Introduction The case is concerned with order 39  rule 1 and rule 2 and Section 96 (1)  of Civil procedure court and sets out the jurisdiction of the lower court.Order 39 rule1 talks about the temporary injunction in any matter and order 39 rule 2 talks about the injunction to restrain or stop repetition or continuance