Case name Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India and Anr. Court Supreme Court of India Bench M. H. Beg (Chief Justice), Y. V. Chandrachud, V. R. Krishna Iyer, P. N. Bhagwati, N. L. Untwalia, S. Murtaza Fazal Ali, P. S. Kailasam Decided on 1978 Relevant statute Article 21 of Indian Constitution Citation AIR 1978 SC […]

Case Name Balfour v Balfour Court Court of Appeal Bench Atkin , Warrington , and Duke Decided on 25 June , 1919 Relevant Statute Indian Contract Act , 1872 Citation 2 KB 571 Facts Of The Case Mr. Balfour and Mrs. Balfour were husband and wife from Ceylon ( Sri Lanka) and once they went

Case  Name Lily Thomas vs. UOI & Ors. Court Supreme court of India Bench S Ahmed , R Sethi Decided on Pronounced on April 5th , 2000 Relevant Statute Sec 5 ,11 and 17 of Hindu Marriage Act  Citation AIR 2000 SC 1650 Issues of the Case : Whether there should be Uniform Civil Code

Judges :  Ayyangar,  N. Rajagopala Judgement Date : 18 December, 1962 FACTS The petitioner was challenged in a dacoity case but was released as there was no evidence against him. The police opened a history sheet against him and also put him under surveillance as defined in Regulation 236 of the U.P. Police Regulations. Surveillance

Second Appeal No.434 of 1939 Judges : Iqbal Ahmad , C.J and Dar , J Judgement date : Apr 15, 1942 Brief Facts : This is an appeal by Musammat Rao Rani , defendant, arising out of a suit for profits filed in the Revenue Court by Musammat Gulab Rani ,Plaintiff-Respondent, under section 226 of

Judges’ name: L. Nageswara Rao J. and Vineet Saran J. Judgment date: April 28, 2021 Introduction: Every Indian citizen have been granted the right to information under the Right to Information Act, 2005 replacing the former Freedom to Information Act. It helps citizens to hold organisations and governmental bodies substantially funded by the government to