All

Introduction: Brief Facts of the Case: Contentions of the Appellant:  Contentions of the Respondent: Principles and observations of the Court:  Judgment Held:  The Court clarified the extent of the validity of the Sale Deed dated February 12, 2011, and modified the decree passed by the District Court. Opinion:  In my opinion, the decision of the […]

Court: The Supreme Court of India. Judgment Name: Ireo Grace Real Tech Pvt Ltd. V Abhishek Khanna and others (Civil Appeal No. 5785 of 2019) Judgment Date: 11th January 2021. Bench: Justice Indu Malhotra. INTRODUCTION In this case, the Court deals with multiple issues related to the delay in the allotment of the flats to

Court Name: The Supreme Court of India Citations: Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction (Criminal Appeal No. 432 of 2021) JURISDICTIONCRIMINAL [APPEAL NO.432 OF 2021] Case Name: Dharmesh Dharmendra, Dhamo Jagdishbhai Jagabhai Bhagubhai Ratadia & Anr. vs. The State of Gujarat Judgement date – July 07, 2021. Judges/bench – Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hemant Gupta Brief facts

COURT NAME: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA JUDGEMENT NAME: Saranya vs. Bharathi JUDGEMENT DATE: 24 August 2021 JUDGE/BENCH: Dr. DHANANJAYA Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. M.R.SHAH, J. INTRODUCTION: Code of  Criminal Procedure in this The Supreme Court restates that, at Section 482 CrPC in this stage, the supreme court isn’t required to understand the evidence to seek out whether

Introduction  In common parlance, the word ‘Abet’ signifies help, co-activity, and support and incorporates within its ambit, an illegitimate reason to commit the crime. So as to bring an individual abetting the doing of a thing under any of the conditions specified under Section 107 of the Indian Penal Code, it isn’t just important to

Issue – Whether the two–year period specified under Section 11 A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 will apply even after the repeal of the 1894 Act, or the twelve–month period specified in Section 25 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 will apply for the

Introduction: The parties were the shareholders of the investment holding company named Atlas Equifin Private Limited, India. It held 11,05,829 equity shares of Rs.10 each in Multi Screen Media Pvt. Ltd. The appellant attempted to sell the shares in Multi Screen Media Pvt. Ltd. in 2002. Standard Chartered Bank (SCB) made their agent identify the

Introduction: This Judgement clarifies the jurisdiction of the State Investigating Agency to investigate, remand, and commit a case for trial relating to the scheduled offenses under the National Investigation Agency (NIA) Act.  Brief Facts of the Case:  Contentions of the Appellants:  The Appellant claimed that the  State Investigating Agency divested its jurisdiction and breached the

Introduction: Brief Facts of the Case: Contentions of the Appellants: Contentions of the Respondent: Principles and observations of the Court: Judgment Held: The Supreme Court dismissed the writ petition. It has further clarified that their decision will neither restrict the 1st respondent nor the executive from exercising their discretion in the future. Opinion: The decision