All

Court– Supreme Court of India Judgment Name – 1. Ebix Corporation Singapore Pvt. Ltd. – the successful resolution applicant of Educomp Solutions Ltd, Civil Appeal No. 3224 of 2020, 2. Kundan Care- the successful resolution applicant of Astonfield (Kundan Care Appeal) in Kundan Care Products Limited vs Mr Amit Gupta and Ors, Civil Appeal No. […]

CASE: Dr Manoj Kumar Sharma v. State of Uttar Pradesh Through Principal Medical & Health and Others COURT: The Supreme Court of India DATE OF JUDGEMENT : 09th  July,  2021 BENCH: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta PARTIES: Appellant: The State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors. Respondent: Dr. Manoj

Court– Supreme Court of India Judgment Name – Dr. A Suresh Kumar & Ors v. Amit Agarwal (Civil Appeal No. 988 of 2021) Judgment date – 08 July 2021 Coram– Hon’ble J. Vineet Sharan, Hon’ble J. Dinesh Maheshwari Introduction – The term “condonation of delay” refers to the act of allowing a court to overlook

Judgement Name –  Samaul Sk. vs The State Of Jharkhand (CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.894 OF 2021) Judgement date –  31 August, 2021 Judges/bench – Sanjay Kishan Kaul J., Hrishikesh Roy J. , C.T. Ravikumar J. Brief facts of the Case – The facts which have come to the force during the course of hearing clearly highlight

Court: Supreme Court of India Judgement Name: Harjit Singh v. Inderpreet Singh @ Inder and another  Judgement Date: 24th August, 2021 Bench: D.Y. Chandrachud , M.R.Shah Brief Facts of the Case: The respondents accused Indrerpreet Singh( responder no.1)  had conspiring and orchestrating the death of the petitioner’s father Mann Singh in the current case. It

Court name – Supreme Court of India     Judgment Date – 24/08/2021 Judgement name–  The Employees Provident Fund Organization V. Sunil Kumar B. and Ors. Judges/ bench – Hon’ble Judges/Coram: U.U. Lalit and Ajay Rastogi, JJ Introduction Employee Provident Fund (EPF) is a retirement savings plan in which workers contribute a small percentage of their monthly

Judgement Name : Gunashekaran v.s The Division  Engineers National Highway and others on August 24, 2021 Judges Names: K.M.Joseph Judgement Date: August 24,2021 Introduction: The national highways that help to speed up transportation and services are the responsibility of the national highway department, but construction and maintenance are the responsibility of the national highway wing,highways

COURT NAME: Supreme Court JUDGMENT NAME: SEPCO Electric Power Construction Corporation Vs. Power Mesh Projects Ltd. CITATION: CIVIL APPEAL NOS.4936-4937 OF 2021 JUDGMENT DATE: 24th Aug, 2021 BENCH: Justice Indira Banerjee; Justice V. Ramasubramanian INTRODUCTION: In this case, these appeals are contrary to the judgment and decision of 27.11.2020, passed by the Division Bench of

Court– Supreme Court of India Judgment Name – Pankaj Kumar v State of Jharkhand & Ors Judgment date – 19 Aug 2021 Judges– J. Ajay Rastogi, J. U.U. Lalit Introduction – A division bench comprising Justices UU Lalit and Ajay Rastogi held that a person can claim reservation benefits in any of the successor states,

This appeal challenges the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal’s (hereafter referred to as the “NCLAT”) judgment and order dated December 21, 2018, which allowed the appeal filed by respondent herein Kay bouvet. In this case, the defendant has opted to file an appeal with the Appeal Company (AT) (Insolvency) No. 582 of 2018, in defiance