All

In the present world domestic violence is just like evil, which causes harm to the wife by the husband or his family for various kinds like dowry etc. To overcome such issues, laws are made by the legislatures by giving sympathetic concern to the aggrieved because, in India, women are perceived as goddesses. Our Indian […]

Background– The Supreme Court of India held on November 2, 2020, in the case of M/s Imperia Structures Ltd v Anil Patni & Others (Civil Appeal No. 3581-3590 of 2020), that the redressal mechanism / provisions under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016 (RERA) do not act as a bar to complaints under

The case of Justice K.S Puttaswamy v UOI[1] is a landmark case comprising a 9 judge bench where it was held that according to Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Indian Constitution, the Right to Privacy is a fundamental right[2]. The right to privacy, like most other fundamental rights, is not an “absolute right,”

Shreya Singhal v Union of India (2015)[1] is a landmark case that has significant implications for the Indian judicial system. The case centres on the basic right to freedom of speech and expression guaranteed by Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution[2], which was used to challenge the constitutionality of section 66 A of the IT

REPORTABLE                    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA   A.S. Bopanna, J. The appellants in both these appeals are assailing the order dated 01.06.2012 passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in Election Petition No. 7/2008. By the said order, the election of the appellant in C.A. No.

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 721 OF 2021 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (CRIMINAL) NO. 4407 OF 2020) J U D G M E N T HEMANT GUPTA, J. The State and the writ petitioner before the High Court, are aggrieved by an order passed by the learned

REPORTABLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No. 4578 of 2021 (Arising out of SLP (C) No). 10156/2019) North Delhi Municipal Corporation, Appellant(s) VERSUS Dr. Ram Naresh Sharma & Ors.   Respondent(s) WITH Civil Appeal No. 4579/2021 (@SLP(C) No. 10159/2019) Civil Appeal No.4580/2021 (@SLP(C) No. 10160/2019) Civil Appeal No.4581/2021 (@ SLP(C) No.

Judgment – Oil and natural gas corporation Ltd. vs. saw pipes Ltd. Bench- M.B. Shah, Arun Kumar. Court – Supreme court of India Appellant- Oil and natural gas corporation Ltd. Respondent- Saw pipes Ltd. Judgment date- 17/04/2003 The Oil and natural gas Commission has directed Saw Pipes to provide off-shores exploration services available from licensed