Judgments

FACTS: Due to negligent driving of truck driver an accident occurred resulting Jagjit Singh, Husband of appellant’s death. Claim was file in MACT, and compensation was granted. Appeal was made in HC stating that the compensation awarded is not sufficient as the family of two children, wife, mother and other family, who’s 54 acre was […]

FACTS: A forged sale deed was executed without any knowledge of the owner. A criminal suit was filed for criminal conspiracy and civil suit seeking cancellation of the civil suit. Investigation found that the purchasers are the bono fide purchaser without any notice and the person acting as the complainant before the registrar is an

Facts: The appellant established a unit of manufacture of “Spun Line Crown Cork” which is used for packing glass bottles. The appellant was granted the eligibility certificate under ‘modernisation’ instead of the eligibility certificate under the ‘diversification’ scheme by joint spot inquiry. It is required to be noted that if the goods manufactured would have

Facts: The Appellant was aggrieved because Bharat petroleum sub-let appellant’s property to a dealer and had neither vacated nor paid any arrears of rent since 2009 because the lease agreement expired in 2009 between the appellant and Bharat Petroleum way back before. Single judge and Division bench discarded the matter stating the writ was not

Facts That appellant was convicted under 302, 376, 364, 366A, and 201 of the Penal Code. That appellant, under the pretext of giving biscuits, committed rape and murder of a five-year-old girl and threw her dead body into the stream. Both High Court & Trial Court confirmed the death sentence. Hence, this appeal. Contentions by

Facts: There were 5 accused but they did not use any deadly weapon while committing the offense but trial court, session court, and the high court convicted them under section 397. The aggrieved Accused preferred this appeal in Supreme Court. Principle – There is no difference between Section 391/395 and Section 397 IPC so far

Facts The supreme court has taken the court to the hearing of the criminal bail with the consent of the parties, where under a special leave petition being filed the court has ordered a stay upon the release of respondent no. 1 of the cases. Observation: The party has reached the supreme court leaving behind

Facts: Appellant agreed to buy respondent house through an agreement of which advance amount was paid. Thereafter appellant came to know that the respondent is not the owner of the house. So, appellant demanded the advance amount from the respondent. Respondent issued half of the amount through cheque but cheque got bounced. Being aggrieved appellant

Fact: An interim measure for market value of plot Rs.5900/- sq.mr was passed in favour of Noida by High Court in July,2014. Thereafter, a lease deed dated October,2014 was executed stating market value of plot Rs.5900/- sq.mr by way of interim measure only. Present High Court allowed the appeal by 24 Oranges Lab LLP. Aggrieved