Reforming the character and care of Victim – a basic object of Criminal Jurisprudence

Judgement Name - Samaul Sk. vs The State Of Jharkhand (CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.894 OF 2021) Judgement date - 31 August,...

Where does the jurisdiction of National Highways lie?

Judgement Name : Gunashekaran v.s The Division Engineers National Highway and others on August 24, 2021 Judges Names: K.M.Joseph Judgement...

Are ‘Scheduled Indian Bank’ and ‘Scheduled Bank located in India’ any different?

COURT NAME: Supreme Court JUDGMENT NAME: SEPCO Electric Power Construction Corporation Vs. Power Mesh Projects Ltd. CITATION: CIVIL APPEAL NOS.4936-4937...

IS EXHORTING THE CRIMINAL JUST BEFORE THE CRIME, A CRIMINAL ACT?

Court: The Supreme Court of India Judgment Name: Sandeep Vs State of Haryana(Criminal Appeal No. 1613 of 2018) Judgment Date:...

“Reservation benefit can’t be availed by a person simultaneously in two successor states”: SC

Court- Supreme Court of India Judgment Name - Pankaj Kumar v State of Jharkhand & Ors Judgment date - 19...

Valuation of Trees under Land Acquisition Act

Facts: Land was acquired under acquisition act and appellant is aggrieved for less compensation and required trees to be valued...

The tax, an individual or a corporate is required to pay, is a matter of planning for a taxpayer and the Government should endeavor to keep it convenient and simple to achieve maximization of compliance.

Question of Law: Whether Section 14A, enables the Income tax Department to make disallowance on expenditure incurred for earning tax...

Mutation entry does not confer any right, title or interest and is only for the fiscal purpose

Facts: Petitioner filed application to mutate his name in revenue records on the basis of the will. The High Court...

Extension of tenure granted to officers who have attained the age of superannuation should be done only in rare and exceptional cases.

Issue: The grievance of the Petitioner is that the extension of tenure of the second Respondent to three years is...

Retrospectivity cannot be presumed, unless there is a clear intention in the new rule or amendment.

Facts: Appellant is state and respondent is a licensee of department of excise duty.Appellant amended a new rule and tried...

Hi there,

Contacts

For any inquiries please email

hm@legalcops.com