Court name: The Supreme Court of India. Judgement name: Small Industries Development Bank of India vs M/s SIBCO Investment Pvt. Ltd.  Judgement date: January 3rd 2022 Judges/ Bench: R. Subhash Reddy and Hrishikesh Roy Introduction: The challenge in these appeals is to the judgment and order dated 25.11.2019 of the Division Bench of the High […]

SUSHIL KUMAR v THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS., CIVIL APPEAL NO. 401 OF 2022 This Civil appeal arises out of the final judgement dated 29.07.2015 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh passed in LPA No. 1910 of 2011.  Facts: The appellant, Sushil Kumar was appointed as a constable in 1995.

This case arises due to dissatisfaction with the impugned judgement and order dated 23.11.2017 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in Writ Appeal No. 29/2011. Legal Provision: The Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971 (‘1971 Act’) came into force in the year 1971. Section 3 of the 1971 Act provides

Court name : The supreme court of India Judgment Name : State of U.P  Vs. Jai Dutt and Anr.  Judgment Date : January 19th, 2022 Judges/Bench : M.R. SHAH and B.V. NAGARATHNA Introduction  Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 18.09.2019 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Criminal Appeal No.8 70

Brief facts of this case: In this case, the MRTP commission dismissed a lawsuit brought by some home buyers (plaintiffs) under Sections 36-A, 36-B(a) and (d), 36-D, and 36-E of the MRTP Act, as well as Sections 2(i) and 2(0). The buyers were displeased with the builder’s demand for additional fees. According to them, the

Brief facts of this case: In summary, the petitioner was a driver assigned to the 12th P.A.C. Battalion in Fatehpur. The petitioner was operating a truck hauling P.A.C. personnel from Fatehpur to Allahabad on Kumbh Mela duty when it collided with a jeep. The petitioner was charged with causing the accident by driving his truck